Marianne Williamson

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 66
11/23/2024, 7:40:52 PM
X
In reply to:
Zhana Vrangalova, PhD
@DrZhana
·
399d
@marwilliamson Also, how do we process in a way that's organized and systematic so not only intellectual clarity but also organized action comes out of it? TY
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
399d
@DrZhana I don’t think any of us know yet. Millions of us are processing all this, and the processing has to come before we can have any sense of clear direction. Many elected Democrats are now saying out loud what they should’ve been saying for years, but it remains to be seen whether…
Zhana Vrangalova, PhD
@DrZhana
·
399d
@marwilliamson It seems pretty clear to me that the Dem leadership is not willing to learn the lessons from this election or give up control. The corporate money is too good, they're ok with managed decline for the rest of us. And the Orwellian level of information manipulation they've been…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
399d
A matrix of corporate powers - insurance companies, Big Pharma, Big Food, big chemical companies, gun manufacturers, Big Oil and defense contractors - effectively own this country.
🧵

The statement engages in a philosophical discussion about personal and collective processing of societal issues, suggesting that change is more profound when it occurs internally rather than externally. It is part of a broader conversation about political leadership and systemic issues in the United States.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and encourages introspection, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by suggesting that deep, personal reflection is necessary for change, aligning with the principle of using words to promote understanding. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]