In reply to:
Ben Kew
@ben_kew
·
395d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of climate change and the stance of the US government, which are significant public concerns. The tone is critical and expresses concern over the government's position on climate change.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses concern over a policy stance, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a focus on the issue rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting the perceived consequences of a governmental stance on climate change, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a policy stance but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on the issue rather than the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a viewpoint on a public issue and uses the platform to engage in civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.