Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 79
Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
·
394d
Yes, it’s true that cutting bureaucracy will reduce the federal deficit, but the real win will be its pro-growth effect. The biggest cost of bureaucracy isn’t the headcount costs, it’s that bureaucrats find legally dubious “things to do” that stifle freedom & depress our economy.
11/25/2024, 10:25:55 PM
X

The statement critiques government bureaucracy by highlighting inefficiencies, using a comparison between historical and current construction timelines. It suggests that reducing bureaucracy could have economic benefits. The conversation involves public figures and discusses government roles, making it part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight inefficiencies without direct harm, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding of bureaucratic inefficiencies, aligning with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of government processes without personal attacks, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]