Marianne Williamson

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 106
11/26/2024, 10:15:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Infinite Inquiry
@cagematchtime
·
296d
@marwilliamson All of those departments are already captured. Hopefully, the press does not all of the sudden blame the obvious capture of these industries on Trump. It already exists.

The goal is to rid them of corruption and capture. Unleash them for sure.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
296d
Several months ago there was an article going around about a bottle of ketchup in the United States compared to a bottle of ketchup in Canada. It was an example, like so many, of how ingredients in a product sold in the U.S. are often less safe than when the same product is sold…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the differences in policies between two U.S. presidents, Trump and Biden, in the context of a conversation about industry capture and corruption. It implies a critique of presidential influence on policy direction.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the complexities of policy-making.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it simplifies the differences in policies to personal wishes. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks depth and does not address the specifics of the policies or the conversation about industry capture. [-1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform to provide a responsible or insightful contribution to the discussion.