In reply to:
Awitty Fellow
@JustTrollinLibs
·
146d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
146d
The statement engages in a public discourse about wealth distribution and taxation policies in the United States. It challenges the notion that the wealthy are not part of the problem by highlighting the significant wealth transfer from the majority to the top one percent over the past decades.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on economic issues, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of wealth inequality, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the economic argument presented, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By discussing wealth inequality, the statement uses influence to highlight societal issues, aligning with the principle of betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss a public issue, upholding the principle of using a platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.