In reply to:
PaultheUPSguy
@PFNeveujr
·
145d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
145d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing significant public issues related to government spending, military budgets, and past military engagements. It challenges the allocation of resources and calls into question the effectiveness and accountability of such expenditures.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather focuses on critiquing government spending, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting issues of government spending and accountability, encouraging public awareness and discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government policies without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly discuss public spending issues, upholding the principles of free speech and integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.