In reply to:
Luke Savage
@LukewSavage
·
142d
The conversation critiques political operatives for using language that lacks substance and truth, focusing instead on messaging and aesthetics. The reply 'Indeed' agrees with this critique, reinforcing the idea that such communication is misleading.
- The statement aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by calling out potentially harmful communication practices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by discussing general practices rather than targeting individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting issues in political communication. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by addressing the problem without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.