In reply to:
Amy Logan
@teaching_amy
·
129d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
129d
The statement engages in a public discourse about immigration policy and the distinction between criminal actions and innocent individuals, such as children. It responds to a conversation about deportation and public safety, contributing to a broader societal debate.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but clarifies a distinction between criminals and innocent children, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by emphasizing that a child should not be associated with criminal actions, thus avoiding hate speech or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by distinguishing between criminals and innocent individuals, fostering empathy for the latter. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a specific point in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.