In reply to:
Bobbie
@JulieJanklow
·
127d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
127d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning immigration policies and the potential impact on families. The tone is defensive and empathetic, aiming to clarify a stance on human suffering and historical context.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating against actions that could traumatize families, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes empathy and compassion by referencing past crises and the importance of not ignoring human suffering. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing criticism without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by opposing harmful policies, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important societal issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.