Marianne Williamson

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 134
11/29/2024, 8:59:47 AM
X
In reply to:
Kelly B
@Vendettacreme
·
125d
@marwilliamson @JulieJanklow Soldiers in the streets is definitely a bad idea, but an open border is not a humanitarian policy. Illegal immigrants are basically a slave class with no rights, and the trafficking is horrific. I’d love to see broader discussion on this topic.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
125d
@JulieJanklow Because I don’t want soldiers bursting into the homes of traumatized families? That’s a “revised version” of me? If you knew me then, you were around during the AIDS crisis. We didn’t ignore human suffering then and I don’t see how we can ignore it now. Open to see what I’m…
Bobbie
@JulieJanklow
·
125d
@marwilliamson I admired you for so long
Used to go to your church on fountain
Back then you emanated warmth hope vision and calm
This revised version of you
Brings me down baffled and switched
Off
You have many gifts
I’m just not your audience anymore.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
125d
Watch Denver Mayor Mike Johnston.
I’m with him. https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/26/p…

The statement 'Of course there should not be open borders' is part of a broader discussion on immigration policy, specifically addressing the concept of open borders and its implications. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant societal issue, namely immigration policy and its humanitarian and legal aspects.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of the complexities of immigration issues, which might indirectly contribute to harm if not carefully considered. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks an effort to promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it presents a definitive stance without elaboration or acknowledgment of the humanitarian concerns raised in the preceding conversation. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it also does not contribute to constructive dialogue by providing reasoning or engaging with the points made by others in the conversation.
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on a public issue, but it could use more responsible engagement by providing context or reasoning to foster a more informed discussion.