In reply to:
Big Tom Callahan🇺🇸
@CallahanAutoCo
·
26d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
26d
The statement is part of a public discourse on wealth disparity and the role of bankers versus billionaires in societal issues. It engages with a broader conversation about economic inequality and its potential consequences.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a divisive narrative by singling out bankers.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it simplifies a complex issue by blaming a specific group without further explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks depth and does not provide a rationale for the blame placed on bankers. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to participate in a public debate, but it lacks responsibility and integrity by not providing a nuanced perspective. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.