In reply to:
🔥 CEO Branding Expert
@Ceo_Branding
·
27d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
27d
The statement is part of a conversation about the selection of a new DNC Chair, which is a public issue related to political leadership and party dynamics. The original conversation by @marwilliamson critiques the current political strategies and calls for a more energetic approach to counter Trumpism, which constitutes public discourse. The reply by @Ceo_Branding, 'More than I can put in a tweet,' suggests a limitation in expressing a complex opinion within the constraints of a tweet, indicating an intent to engage substantively but is limited by the medium.
- The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from it either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral stance.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly, acknowledging the complexity of the issue but is limited by the medium.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.