The statement critiques the relationship between the state and technology companies, suggesting that government influence is the true source of censorship rather than the tech companies themselves. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of state power, censorship, and the role of technology in society.
- The statement does not directly harm others with its words, but it could be seen as provocative, potentially inciting distrust in government without offering a constructive solution.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It presents a critical view without fostering dialogue or understanding between differing perspectives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on government and tech censorship, but it could be more responsible by providing a balanced perspective or solutions.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.