Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 78

The statement critiques the delegation of regulatory authority to private companies, suggesting it leads to negative outcomes like tech censorship and debanking, and labels it as a 'soft form of fascism.' It engages in public discourse by addressing government policy and its societal impacts.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('soft form of fascism') which could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It critiques government and corporate actions without targeting individuals, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses charged language that may polarize rather than foster dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism of policies but does not provide constructive solutions or engage in dialogue, focusing instead on a negative portrayal. [-1]