Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement references a public issue involving the White House's stance on a potential presidential pardon, which is a matter of public interest and political discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of the White House's previous statements.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on highlighting a perceived inconsistency. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather questions the integrity of a public statement. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on pointing out a potential discrepancy.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its platform to question public officials, which can be seen as contributing to public accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning public officials, but the integrity of the platform is not clear from the statement alone. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.