Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a journalist questioning the White House Press Secretary about the President's stance on pardoning his son and his role in a political race. This is a part of public discourse as it engages with political accountability and transparency, which are public issues.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is a straightforward question about political accountability.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on public figures and their roles without engaging in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a direct question about political actions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by asking for clarification on political decisions, without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by seeking information on public matters. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.