Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses a political issue involving a presidential pardon, suggesting it is a strategic move to protect Hunter Biden from future investigations. The tone is speculative and critical, implying potential misuse of presidential power.
- The statement could contribute to public skepticism and distrust, potentially causing harm by spreading unverified claims. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it speculates on motives without evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it presents an accusation without supporting evidence, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.