Andrew Yang

The statement questions the effectiveness of a firearm purchase form in identifying drug addicts, implying skepticism about its practical use. It indirectly engages with public issues related to gun control and drug addiction policies.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as trivializing the issue of drug addiction.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards individuals struggling with addiction. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is more of a rhetorical question than a substantive argument. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses free speech to question policy effectiveness but lacks depth and responsibility in addressing the issue.