Reposted by Vivek Ramaswamy
The statement presents a comparison of the cost of illegal immigration in 2023 with historical expenditures on major projects, suggesting a significant financial impact on taxpayers. The intent appears to be to highlight the economic burden of illegal immigration, potentially influencing public opinion or policy discussions.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it could contribute to negative perceptions of immigrants if not contextualized with empathy and understanding.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks elements that promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards immigrants, focusing solely on financial costs. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not invite constructive dialogue or present a balanced view.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses data to influence public opinion, but it does not clearly indicate a positive societal impact or suggest solutions.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech by presenting data, but it should ensure accuracy and context to maintain integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.