The statement critiques the idea of NGOs receiving government funding, suggesting it is illogical. It references a specific NGO involved in a political event, implying a need for scrutiny by public figures. The tone is critical and suggests a call to action.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of government funding for NGOs, which could be seen as a call for accountability.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but suggests a need for public figures to investigate, which could foster dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question government funding practices, potentially contributing to public debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.