In reply to:
Just In
@nitsuj180
·
166d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
166d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the transparency and accountability of political decision-making, particularly concerning the Democratic primary and its implications for future elections.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a need for accountability, which can be seen as a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the actions of political figures, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by highlighting the importance of transparency in political processes, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the decision-making process without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By calling for transparency, the statement uses influence to advocate for a more informed electorate, which aligns with societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning political processes and decisions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.