In reply to:
Money N Vision🟥🟧🗽🌆🌳🌞
@MoneyVisCoach
·
167d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
167d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing historical perspectives on political parties and their impact on democracy, in response to a conversation about the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and its role in elections.
- The statement does not use harmful language and instead references historical figures to provide context, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By invoking historical warnings about political parties, the statement aims to promote understanding and reflection on current political dynamics, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead focusing on historical analysis, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses historical context to encourage reflection on political loyalty and democracy, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss political issues, aligning with the principle of using one's platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.