In reply to:
Curious George
@impishchimp
·
235d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
235d
The statement engages in a discussion about media bias and the credibility of journalists, which are public issues. The tone is skeptical and challenges the credibility of Aaron Rupar by comparing him to Fox News, suggesting a perceived similarity in bias.
- The statement does not directly harm with words, but it implies a negative comparison, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it questions the credibility of a public figure, which could affect their dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence to support the claim, and it borders on a personal attack by questioning the integrity of Aaron Rupar. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.