The statement engages in public discourse by discussing media trust, political figures, and the FBI. It reflects on past media coverage and expresses regret for not trusting a particular memo, suggesting a critique of media practices and political narratives.
- The statement does not directly harm others but critiques media practices, which can be seen as constructive criticism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to a polarized discourse by aligning with a specific political narrative. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices but could be perceived as aligning with a partisan viewpoint, which may not foster open dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.