The statement addresses the issue of foreign influence through social media apps, specifically mentioning a Chinese app banned in India and suggesting a similar action in the speaker's country. It calls for action against misinformation and division, indicating engagement in public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies a negative view of foreign apps, which could be seen as promoting division.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but could be interpreted as targeting a specific country, which may not fully respect the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on banning and stopping influence rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without addressing potential counterarguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a societal change, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society by reducing misinformation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion but could be more responsible by providing a balanced view and considering the implications of a ban.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.