Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 14 of 47

Score 90

-3

A classic tactic we’ve seen over the last few years: when a trendy new progressive push eventually becomes unmasked for the poison that it is (ESG, DEI, etc.), they find a way to keep doing it while just changing the name to something new: “Sustainability,” “Accessibility,” etc.

Robby Starbuck

@robbystarbuck

301d

Massive red flag to report, we need @DOGE @elonmusk and @VivekGRamaswamy aware of this: A high level source tells me that the NSA is renaming their DEIA office to "EEO & A" which is supposed to stand for equal employment opportunity and accessibility.

Internally their messaging…

12/7/2024, 12:57:14 PM

The statement critiques the renaming of government initiatives, suggesting it is a tactic to disguise their true nature. It implies skepticism towards progressive policies and their rebranding.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong language ('poison') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not respect the dignity of those who support or work on these initiatives, potentially engaging in dismissive rhetoric. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead making a broad critique without specific evidence or engagement with opposing views. [-1]