Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
12/7/2024, 1:27:40 PM
X
In reply to:
Mary Coleman🇺🇸
@MaryCol81396498
·
208d
@marwilliamson Please define “philosophy of governance“. Why do you assume that they will cut veterans benefits?

The problem isn’t that the rich aren’t taxed enough, the problem is that the government spends foolishly, and excessively.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
208d
@MaryCol81396498 This has nothing to do with how patriotic they are. It has to do with their philosophy of governance.
Mary Coleman🇺🇸
@MaryCol81396498
·
208d
@marwilliamson I’m calling BS. This is a very patriotic group of leaders. They are going to take care of the veterans. You are fear mongering.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
208d
With all the cutting that DOGE plans to do on things like veterans’ health benefits and cancer research, they won’t whisper a word about asking the wealthiest people in our society to give up anything at all. 🧵

The statement engages in a public discourse about taxation, government spending, and economic policy, responding to a conversation about governance and fiscal responsibility. The tone is assertive, aiming to counter a previous point about government spending and taxation of the wealthy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but is assertive in its disagreement.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on countering an argument.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the argument about government spending and taxation, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]