Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
12/7/2024, 2:53:13 PM
X
In reply to:
Mary Coleman🇺🇸
@MaryCol81396498
·
208d
@marwilliamson The money pie is infinite and we all have to create whatever level of abundance that we think we deserve in this lifetime. Why the rich person hate? Money moves generationally.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
208d
@MaryCol81396498 First of all, extremely low taxes for the very rich *is* foolish and excessive government spending. And I’ve posted it twice.
Mary Coleman🇺🇸
@MaryCol81396498
·
209d
@marwilliamson Please define “philosophy of governance“. Why do you assume that they will cut veterans benefits?

The problem isn’t that the rich aren’t taxed enough, the problem is that the government spends foolishly, and excessively.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
209d
@MaryCol81396498 This has nothing to do with how patriotic they are. It has to do with their philosophy of governance.
Mary Coleman🇺🇸
@MaryCol81396498
·
209d
@marwilliamson I’m calling BS. This is a very patriotic group of leaders. They are going to take care of the veterans. You are fear mongering.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
209d
With all the cutting that DOGE plans to do on things like veterans’ health benefits and cancer research, they won’t whisper a word about asking the wealthiest people in our society to give up anything at all. 🧵

The statement engages in a discussion about economic inequality and wealth distribution, which are significant public issues. The tone is assertive but not aggressive, aiming to clarify a stance on wealth distribution and economic justice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and aims to clarify a position rather than attack. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging agreement with some wealthy individuals, suggesting a nuanced view of economic issues. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing misconceptions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss economic justice, a relevant societal issue, responsibly. [+1]