Jake Tapper

The statement by @Levitt_Matt addresses a significant public issue, namely the political dynamics and human rights concerns related to the reintegration of Assad into the Arab League. It critiques the actions of Arab states in the context of Assad's alleged human rights violations, thus engaging in public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm with words but highlights a controversial political decision, which could be seen as a critique rather than harmful speech.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize political actions.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critique. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of political actions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to bring attention to a significant political issue, potentially for societal betterment. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly critiquing a public issue. [+1]