Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a discussion about the January 6 Committee and potential criminal activity, which are public issues. The tone is measured, suggesting an investigation if warranted, without endorsing Trump's more extreme rhetoric.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but suggests a review of the investigation, which is neutral.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting a review rather than endorsing punitive measures without evidence. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing public issues responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.