In reply to:
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a public issue related to constitutional law and policy changes proposed by a political figure. It questions the feasibility and legality of altering the Constitution, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions a political action, which is a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on questioning a political action.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue by questioning a political proposal but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning a public policy proposal responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.