Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement involves a report from a journalist in a conflict zone, touching on cultural and gender dynamics, which are public issues. It hints at the broader implications of these dynamics in the context of the Syrian conflict.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it highlights a cultural practice that may be seen as oppressive, which could be interpreted as harmful by some.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does highlight a cultural practice that could be sensitive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by shedding light on cultural practices in conflict zones, but it lacks explicit empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the journalist's influence to bring attention to cultural and gender issues in a conflict zone, which could be seen as contributing to societal awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on sensitive issues responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.