Jeremy Kauffman 🦔🌲🌕
@jeremykauffman
·
219d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of high prescription drug costs in the U.S. and the healthcare system's inefficiencies. The statement suggests that the U.S. subsidizes pharmaceutical innovation, while other countries benefit without bearing the costs. The conversation critiques this view and highlights the high costs and poor outcomes of the U.S. healthcare system.
- The use of the term 'parasites' is harmful and derogatory, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The language used lacks respect and dignity, particularly with the term 'parasites,' which can be seen as cyberbullying or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses inflammatory language rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation attempts to engage in dialogue about healthcare costs but does so with personal attacks and ad hominem language, which undermines constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.