Vivek Ramaswamy

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement critiques the funding mechanism of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), suggesting it is constitutionally questionable and anti-democratic. It implies that this funding structure makes the agency vulnerable to being shut down, which is presented as a positive outcome. The tone is critical and suggests a call to action regarding the agency's oversight and existence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as undermining the agency's role in consumer protection, which might indirectly affect public welfare. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on a critical view without offering a balanced perspective or constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the CFPB's funding structure but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to critique a public agency, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment through increased oversight, but it lacks a constructive approach.
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech to critique a public agency, which is a responsible use of the platform, but it could be more balanced and constructive. [+1]