The statement discusses the slowing of AI scaling and claims vindication against popular figures who previously ridiculed the idea. It emphasizes the importance of data over popular opinion.
- The statement asserts a factual claim based on data, which aligns with striving to do no harm by promoting truth. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The mention of ridicule and specific individuals could be seen as lacking respect for privacy and dignity, though it does not engage in direct harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue, as it focuses on past ridicule rather than fostering understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.