Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 69
12/13/2024, 10:46:14 PM
X
In reply to:
HerKarmaKills ❤️
@KarmaSkills
·
215d
@sandyjfisher @marwilliamson She literally is justifying murder here and diminishing responsibility of the murderer whilst justifying why he did it. She did it in a sly way by distancing herself from the message by saying "obviously you shouldn't commit murder" but the inherent bias in her message is clear.
Sandy Fisher
@sandyjfisher
·
215d
@KarmaSkills @marwilliamson No she didn’t. Just the opposite-actually.
HerKarmaKills ❤️
@KarmaSkills
·
215d
@marwilliamson What happened to your basis of love and light? Shame on you for supporting brutal assassination! You can use odd wording to basically tell us you support this chaos. I absolutely believed the things you have said and written, I guess it is all an act and breaks my heart.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
215d
Re Luigi, the issue isn't about "should" or "shouldn't." Obviously no one should commit murder.
The issue is about what IS. As JFK said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."
The soullessness of crony capitalism is going…

The statement 'Nope' is a brief and dismissive response in a conversation about a serious topic involving accusations of justifying murder. The tone is dismissive and does not contribute substantively to the public discourse on the issue being discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The dismissive nature of the response does not directly cause harm, but it does not contribute positively to the discussion either.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The response does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it lacks respect for the ongoing conversation's seriousness.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The response does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the previous statement without explanation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The response does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply dismisses the previous statement without providing reasoning or engaging with the argument. [-1]