Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 69
12/13/2024, 11:01:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Reed
@ReedReed1379532
·
216d
@marwilliamson @KarmaSkills @sandyjfisher U let hatred for republicans turn u into a cancer to society that does nothing but further the divide. I know u lack the self awareness to realize that ur no different than the far right. All u do is attack people all day. Think about it. The world is less divided w/o u in it,,.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
216d
@KarmaSkills @sandyjfisher Nope
HerKarmaKills ❤️
@KarmaSkills
·
216d
@sandyjfisher @marwilliamson She literally is justifying murder here and diminishing responsibility of the murderer whilst justifying why he did it. She did it in a sly way by distancing herself from the message by saying "obviously you shouldn't commit murder" but the inherent bias in her message is clear.
Sandy Fisher
@sandyjfisher
·
216d
@KarmaSkills @marwilliamson No she didn’t. Just the opposite-actually.
HerKarmaKills ❤️
@KarmaSkills
·
216d
@marwilliamson What happened to your basis of love and light? Shame on you for supporting brutal assassination! You can use odd wording to basically tell us you support this chaos. I absolutely believed the things you have said and written, I guess it is all an act and breaks my heart.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
216d
Re Luigi, the issue isn't about "should" or "shouldn't." Obviously no one should commit murder.
The issue is about what IS. As JFK said, "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."
The soullessness of crony capitalism is going…

The statement 'I don’t hate Republicans, but good try…' is part of a larger conversation that involves accusations and defenses regarding political views and actions. It constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to political division and societal attitudes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but it is part of a heated exchange that could contribute to a divisive atmosphere. It neither significantly aligns with nor violates the principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It attempts to clarify a position rather than attack. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is defensive in nature and does not contribute to bridging divides.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement avoids personal attacks and focuses on clarifying a stance, which aligns with engaging in dialogue without ad hominem arguments. [+1]