In reply to:
Martin Nelly
@MartinNell22543
·
419d
The statement is part of a conversation about public figures and their positions on deep learning and large language models (LLMs). It involves a discussion of public figures' stances and criticisms, which can be considered public discourse as it touches on the broader debate about AI technologies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does involve a defensive tone in response to criticism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a defensive posture against perceived attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it focuses on defending against personal attacks rather than addressing the substance of the debate. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.