Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
12/14/2024, 8:43:28 PM
X
In reply to:
alienzzzzz
@awoooouwuooooo
·
419d
@GaryMarcus Yes but it's clearly not 99%

and the way the algorithm works you're going to be fed more of what you engage with so if you engage with Elon then you're going to see a lot of Elon but I'm skeptical to believe that it's actually 99%

and that's the very definition of…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
419d
@awoooouwuooooo How would you know what I see? Almost all the misinfo i see comes stuff that is served up from Elon even though I unfollowed him.

He IS the epicenter: https://www.reuters.com/world/us…
alienzzzzz
@awoooouwuooooo
·
419d
this is misinformation and should be labeled
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
419d
99% of the misinformation I see is from one person: the guy who posted this cartoon (which itself is political misinformation).

The statement engages in a discussion about misinformation and algorithmic influence on social media, which is a public issue. The tone is skeptical and defensive, aiming to counter claims about misinformation spread by a specific individual.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but challenges the idea of widespread misinformation.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but indirectly engages in a broader debate about misinformation sources.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more defensive and dismissive. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in dialogue but lacks constructive criticism, focusing on personal beliefs rather than evidence. [-1]