Peter Diamandis

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 140

The statement and conversation suggest a call to action for technologists to aggressively pursue their goals, leveraging political connections. It implies a strategic advantage due to the presence of tech-aligned individuals in the upcoming administration.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement's aggressive tone may encourage actions that could harm others, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not directly engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could indirectly encourage such behavior. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks elements of promoting understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing instead on aggressive advancement. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead promoting a combative approach. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to promote a specific agenda, but it is unclear if this is for the betterment of society as a whole. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, given the aggressive and potentially divisive tone. [-1]