Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes Sen. Johnson's voting record on gun legislation in the context of a recent school shooting, suggesting a link between his actions and the issue of gun violence.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting a direct link between the senator's vote and the tragedy, which could be seen as inflammatory. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of the senator by attributing blame for the tragedy to his legislative actions. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses a personal attack rather than addressing policy differences. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.