The statement engages with public issues by discussing the political landscape in the United States, referencing election outcomes and the composition of the Supreme Court. It calls for structural reform, indicating a substantive engagement with public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it could be seen as polarizing, which may indirectly contribute to division.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on political power dynamics. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue with those in disagreement.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for structural reform, which could be seen as an attempt to better society from the speaker's perspective. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political viewpoint, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform depend on the content of the linked website. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.