The statement calls for a ban on stock trading by members of Congress, addressing a public issue related to ethics and potential conflicts of interest in government. It suggests that such a ban would align with the views of the majority of constituents, indicating a concern for public opinion and trust in governance.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy change to prevent potential conflicts of interest. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by aligning with the perceived views of constituents, suggesting a shared concern for ethical governance. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on a policy issue, inviting dialogue on the matter. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change that could benefit society by promoting ethical standards in government. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to address a public concern, maintaining integrity by focusing on a policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.