Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about government transparency and accountability regarding drone sightings and national security. It involves a critique of the Department of Defense and other government agencies, suggesting they are not fulfilling their constitutional duties. The conversation includes allegations of conspiracy theories and misinformation, which are significant public issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement implies harm by accusing government officials of lying and violating constitutional duties, which could undermine trust in public institutions. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but challenges the dignity of public officials by accusing them of lying without providing evidence. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations and conspiracy theories. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks by labeling officials as liars. [-1]