Michael Schellenberger

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -71
12/18/2024, 2:26:47 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo @MvonRen Could have had me fooled
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo @MvonRen huh
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo @MvonRen https://x.com/shellenberger/stat…
MarikvR
@MvonRen
·
279d
Chris nails it here.

And there’s much more:

-CO/WY/NE: Hovered over nuclear sites; “30-50” circling a large “mothership,” no sound

-SoCal: Omaha swarmed by brightly-lit objects 100+ mi offshore; 2 documented transmedium events (one involving a sphere moving against 40 kt wind)
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG @ChrisCuomo “An unknown actor appears to be sending a stark message: ‘We can operate drone-like vehicles in American skies, over critical infrastructure and hover even above sensitive military facilities with complete impunity.’” @MvonRen

No big whoop though
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG Excellent @ChrisCuomo
Christopher C. Cuomo
@ChrisCuomo
·
279d
What happened in the classified drone briefing today? We found out the details from both a Democrat and a Republican to keep everything on the same page.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
278d
@NancyMace @gillibrandny @Congressman_JVD @RepEricBurlison @RepRobertGarcia @RepGrothman @RepMTG One of the problems with the DOD et al violating its Constitutional duty is that various people including local politicians introducing conspiracy theories that not only have zero evidence but are in fact contradicted by the evidence.

The statement questions the transparency and truthfulness of the Department of Defense regarding drone incursions in US airspace. It implies skepticism about the DoD's handling of the situation and seeks accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement seeks to hold the DoD accountable, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on institutional accountability rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by questioning the DoD's actions and seeking clarity. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the DoD's transparency and truthfulness without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]