The statement criticizes the legislative process in Washington, D.C., particularly the practice of passing lengthy continuing resolutions (CRs) without adequate review. It suggests a need for change in how legislative business is conducted, implying that current practices lead to reckless spending and waste.
- The statement does not directly harm others but criticizes a process, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a perceived issue in legislative processes, aligning with promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a process rather than personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for change in legislative practices, aligning with using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.