The statement critiques the complexity of omnibus bills and suggests a simpler alternative, presenting a one-page Continuing Resolution. It implies that lengthy bills are unnecessary and filled with 'pork,' or unnecessary spending.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses a derogatory term 'pork-fest' which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes a perspective on government spending but lacks empathy or understanding for the complexities involved. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of current legislative practices but does not attack individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.