In reply to:
Vivek Ramaswamy
@VivekGRamaswamy
·
147d
The statement critiques a proposed Continuing Resolution (CR) for allowing historical spending excesses to persist, while acknowledging it prevents further waste. It engages in public discourse by addressing fiscal policy and government spending.
- The statement aims to critique fiscal policy without harmful language, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by discussing the implications of government spending, though it could be more empathetic towards differing views. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the CR, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.