Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
12/19/2024, 3:19:38 AM
X
In reply to:
Melissa 🐝
@patriot_melissa
·
198d
@marwilliamson @shawn_k2539 Why don’t you use all this energy for something positive instead of throwing mud

You lost the election because you’re out of touch with regular people and the problems that we are facing & you all just don’t care
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
198d
@shawn_k2539 You don't have to disagree with your point (I don't) to realize that some of her commentary - including what I quoted above - is right on. It isn't opinion; it's simply observation.
Professor of Common Sense (pronoun: the dude)
@shawn_k2539
·
198d
@marwilliamson Just so everyone realizes who HCR is. She is a long time Democrat who slants all her writing to promote Democrats and exaggerate Republicans. One of the worlds biggest partisans.
All one has to do is read her work.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
198d
This description of Trump's wealthy supporters and their goals for the administration is from Heather Cox Richardson's newsletter today. It's a great summation:

"They single out reductions in air quality, water quality, chemical, vehicle, and power plant environmental…

The statement addresses the impact of policy decisions, specifically cuts and deregulations, on 'regular people,' which constitutes public discourse as it engages with societal issues and public policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement highlights potential harm to 'regular people' from policy decisions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm by raising awareness of potential negative impacts. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By focusing on the effects of policy on 'regular people,' the statement promotes understanding and empathy for those who may be adversely affected. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, instead focusing on the policy's impact. [+1]