Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 66
12/19/2024, 3:31:35 PM
X
In reply to:
Jacob Aron
@jjaron
·
276d
@GaryMarcus Yes I agree, I would have preferred to see it in the main body of the paper!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
276d
@jjaron i can’t believe this critical test is buried like this (see last pgh)
Jacob Aron
@jjaron
·
276d
@GaryMarcus No, but our reporter spoke to them about it
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
276d
@jjaron it’s in a supplement. do you have the actual supplement?
Jacob Aron
@jjaron
·
276d
@GaryMarcus The researchers did actually check this (worth noting that it's not an OpenAI paper either) https://www.newscientist.com/art…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
276d
You have to read very far into the replies in thread to discover that the cases may be in the training set.

Caveat emptor.

The conversation involves a discussion about the transparency and accessibility of critical information in a research paper related to AI in diagnostics. The participants express concern about the placement of important data in supplementary materials rather than the main body of the paper, which could affect the interpretation and credibility of the research.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and conversation aim to highlight potential issues in research transparency, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by advocating for clearer communication of important information. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding by discussing the implications of where critical information is placed in research publications, fostering a more informed dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The participants engage in constructive criticism of the research paper's presentation, focusing on the content rather than personal attacks. [+1]